Editorial review pending — noindex
This page remains under independent editorial review (reviewPending). Visible but noindexed. Educational reference only.
No peer-reviewed data on this exact analog
N-Acetyl Semax Amidate (double-capped) has no identified peer-reviewed pharmacology, toxicology, or clinical study under that exact identity. Parent Semax evidence and Russian registration do not transfer. Vendor “better Semax” claims are not evidence.
Section 1 of 6Overview
Overview
N-Acetyl Semax Amidate (NA-Semax Amidate) is a synthetic Semax analogue with both an N-terminal acetyl and a C-terminal amide. PubChem CID 172638603 lists formula C₃₉H₅₄N₁₀O₁₀S, MW 855.0, and CAS synonym 2920938-90-3. It is sold as a research chemical, not as a registered medicine in any jurisdiction identified in the 2026-10-07 dossier.
Section 2 of 6Parent vs this variant
Parent vs this variant
| Semax (parent) | N-Acetyl Semax Amidate | |
|---|---|---|
| Caps | Free N- and C-termini | Ac- … -NH₂ |
| Formula / MW | C₃₇H₅₁N₉O₁₀S · ~813.9 | C₃₉H₅₄N₁₀O₁₀S · 855.0 |
| PubChem | CID 9811102 | CID 172638603 |
| Regulatory | Registered in Russia (intranasal); not FDA/EMA | None identified |
| Evidence | Limited mostly Russian human + preclinical | No peer-reviewed study of this exact molecule |
PubChem synonyms that say only “N-acetyl semax” can blur Ac-only vs amidate — this page means the double-capped CID 172638603 entity.
Section 3 of 6Nearby papers (not this molecule)
Nearby papers (not this molecule)
Magrì et al., 2016 (PMID 27586814)
N-terminal acetylation of Semax vs Semax: Cu(II)/Zn(II) coordination and SH-SY5Y cell protection. Acetylation changed Cu complexes; Ac-Semax did not protect cells against Cu-induced toxicity where Semax did — free N-terminus mattered in that model. Applies to N-acetyl, not a documented C-amidate. It contradicts naive “acetyl = better neuroprotection” marketing for that endpoint.
Shevchenko et al., 2013 (PMID 23652441)
Lab stability of “Semax acetyl” against proteolysis — not human effect, not documented double-cap.
Vanhee et al., 2020 (PMID 31667971)
Analytical/forensic context for seized “cognitive enhancing research peptides” — market presence, not efficacy.
PubMed queries for the exact product name found no clinical or in-vivo pharmacology of the double-capped amidate (dossier cut).
Section 4 of 6Claims vs evidence
Claims vs evidence
| Claim | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Double-capped Semax analogue (Ac + NH₂) | Supported chemically (PubChem) |
| Better / longer / stronger Semax | Not verified |
| Increased metabolic stability | Hypothesis / Ac-only lab — not double-cap human PK |
| BDNF / nootropic effects “as Semax” | Extrapolation from parent |
| Ac-form preserves Cu protection | Contradicted in cell study (PMID 27586814) for Ac-only |
| FDA/EMA/RU approved | False for the variant |
| Vendor dose = clinical dose | Reject |
Section 5 of 6Related pages
Related pages
- Parent (do not copy dose/approval here): Semax
- Related Selank-line research chemical: N-Acetyl Selank Amidate
Section 6 of 6What this page intentionally omits
What this page intentionally omits
- Any dose or “protocol”
- Copying ГРЛС / Semax study results onto this analog
- Equating Ac-only papers with the amidate product