Editorial review pending — noindex

This page remains under independent editorial review (reviewPending). Visible but noindexed. Educational reference only.

No peer-reviewed data on this exact analog

N-Acetyl Semax Amidate (double-capped) has no identified peer-reviewed pharmacology, toxicology, or clinical study under that exact identity. Parent Semax evidence and Russian registration do not transfer. Vendor “better Semax” claims are not evidence.

Section 1 of 6Overview

Overview

N-Acetyl Semax Amidate (NA-Semax Amidate) is a synthetic Semax analogue with both an N-terminal acetyl and a C-terminal amide. PubChem CID 172638603 lists formula C₃₉H₅₄N₁₀O₁₀S, MW 855.0, and CAS synonym 2920938-90-3. It is sold as a research chemical, not as a registered medicine in any jurisdiction identified in the 2026-10-07 dossier.

Section 2 of 6Parent vs this variant

Parent vs this variant

Semax (parent)N-Acetyl Semax Amidate
CapsFree N- and C-terminiAc- … -NH₂
Formula / MWC₃₇H₅₁N₉O₁₀S · ~813.9C₃₉H₅₄N₁₀O₁₀S · 855.0
PubChemCID 9811102CID 172638603
RegulatoryRegistered in Russia (intranasal); not FDA/EMANone identified
EvidenceLimited mostly Russian human + preclinicalNo peer-reviewed study of this exact molecule

PubChem synonyms that say only “N-acetyl semax” can blur Ac-only vs amidate — this page means the double-capped CID 172638603 entity.

Section 3 of 6Nearby papers (not this molecule)

Nearby papers (not this molecule)

Magrì et al., 2016 (PMID 27586814)

N-terminal acetylation of Semax vs Semax: Cu(II)/Zn(II) coordination and SH-SY5Y cell protection. Acetylation changed Cu complexes; Ac-Semax did not protect cells against Cu-induced toxicity where Semax did — free N-terminus mattered in that model. Applies to N-acetyl, not a documented C-amidate. It contradicts naive “acetyl = better neuroprotection” marketing for that endpoint.

Shevchenko et al., 2013 (PMID 23652441)

Lab stability of “Semax acetyl” against proteolysis — not human effect, not documented double-cap.

Vanhee et al., 2020 (PMID 31667971)

Analytical/forensic context for seized “cognitive enhancing research peptides” — market presence, not efficacy.

PubMed queries for the exact product name found no clinical or in-vivo pharmacology of the double-capped amidate (dossier cut).

Section 4 of 6Claims vs evidence

Claims vs evidence

ClaimAssessment
Double-capped Semax analogue (Ac + NH₂)Supported chemically (PubChem)
Better / longer / stronger SemaxNot verified
Increased metabolic stabilityHypothesis / Ac-only lab — not double-cap human PK
BDNF / nootropic effects “as Semax”Extrapolation from parent
Ac-form preserves Cu protectionContradicted in cell study (PMID 27586814) for Ac-only
FDA/EMA/RU approvedFalse for the variant
Vendor dose = clinical doseReject
Section 5 of 6Related pages
Section 6 of 6What this page intentionally omits

What this page intentionally omits

  • Any dose or “protocol”
  • Copying ГРЛС / Semax study results onto this analog
  • Equating Ac-only papers with the amidate product